Wednesday, 18 November 2015

Paris Attacks Response

Paris attacks: France intensifies air strikes on Isis in Syria

FT Reporters, Last updated: November 17, 2015 8:05 am

France launched a fresh set of air strikes on the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa in Syria early Tuesday morning as the country steps up its response to last week’s deadly attack in Paris.

The bombings follow similar action on Sunday night, where 12 aircraft had taken part in raids on an Isis command centre. They came as an extensive ground operation in France and Belgium to attempt to catch those responsible continued.

Officials said the strikes on Tuesday morning destroyed a command post and a training camp.

France used special state of emergency powers to carry out a further 128 searches on Monday night and Tuesday morning, according to the interior minister Bernard Cazeneuve, speaking on France Info.

This follows the 168 that were carried out on Sunday night, which led to 23 arrests and
the seizure of 31 weapons, including Kalashnikov rifles and a rocket launcher.

John Kerry, the US secretary of state, will also meet President François Hollande on Tuesday morning in Paris where the two are expected to discuss strategy in Syria. The French raids were conducted with US support.

Mr Hollande on Monday called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, adding he would meet presidents Barack Obama of the US and Vladimir Putin of Russia soon in his bid to form a “big unified coalition” against Isis.

Meanwhile, Russia said that the Metrojet flight which crashed over Egypt on October 31 with the deaths of 224 people was brought down by a bomb.

“On the flight a self-made explosive device of up to 1.5kg TNT equivalent operated,” Alexander Bortnikov, head of the Federal Security Service or FSB told the country’s Security Council, adding that traces of explosive had been found in the wreckage.

Mr Putin vowed to find the perpetrators, adding that his country needed to intensify its own air strikes in Syria.

The international manhunt for the suspected “eighth man” in the Paris attacks was also under way Tuesday morning. Salah Abdeslam, a 26-year-old French national known to have re-entered Belgium on Saturday morning and named by police as involved in Friday’s attacks.

Monday’s anti-terror operation in Molenbeek, a rundown area of Brussels, failed to catch the suspect, who is believed to be still at large.

Mr Hollande on Monday demanded sweeping new powers for the French state to take on Isis in the wake of Friday’s chilling co-ordinated attacks on Paris as he pledged all-out war against the terrorist group.

Addressing a rare joint session of both houses of parliament, Mr Hollande called for the state of emergency to be extended to three months and for new authority to strip French citizenship from people involved in terrorism.

“These acts of war have been decided and planned in Syria,” he said. “They have been organised in Belgium and perpetrated on our soil with French accomplices.”

France would battle Isis “without a respite, without a truce . . . It is not a question of containing but of destroying this organisation”, he added, as the investigation continued into the massacre of least 129 people on Friday night.

Mr Hollande said France would seek agreement on a European plan for sharing airline passenger data and called for “co-ordinated and systemic checks’’ at the borders of Europe’s Schengen free movement area.

Mr Kerry on Monday described the attackers as ”psychopathic monsters”. He rejected the idea of that conflict against the Islamic State militants is a clash of civilisations.

“There’s nothing civilised about them,” he said.

Seven suspects died in the attacks — six set off their explosives and one was shot by the police.

Samy Amimour, who was named as one of the attackers at the Bataclan concert venue, violated travel restrictions placed on him in 2013 and had been subject to an international arrest warrant at the time, according to the prosecutor’s office.

A Syrian passport in the name of Ahmad Al Mohammad was found at the scene of the attack at the Stade de France near his body. But François Molins, the Paris public prosecutor, said the authenticity of the passport “had yet to be verified”.

The other attackers included Omar Ismael Mostefai, a 29-year-old French citizen of Algerian origin, who died after attacking the Bataclan, and Bilal Hadfi, 20, who is reported to have blown himself up at the Stade de France but whose identity has not yet formally been confirmed by the prosecutors.

French officials have also signalled they suspect the involvement in planning the attacks of Abdelhamid Abaaoud, a Belgian linked to attempts this year on a high-speed train to Paris and a church in the city’s suburbs.

John Brennan, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, described the attacks as a “wake-up” call about the technical and legal restrictions that intelligence services face in collecting information.

He said on Monday that terrorist groups such as Isis had achieved a significant increase in “operational security” through the use of new technologies that can hide their identity and had “gone to school” on the methods that intelligence agencies use to track them.

Mr Brennan added that Isis had been plotting the Paris attacks for “a number of months” and was likely to be planning other such operations.

“I am sorry to say that this is something we are going to have to deal with for quite some time,” he said.

Response:

This article was very needed in several places. Not only did it nullify rumors about what France is going to do next, but it gave a peace to the people that their country is fighting the evil and they are being protected. This reassuring concept probably helps people to process the situation and respond accordingly. Considering the US is backing up France's actions, Its probably updating US citizens as well. France obviously seeks to disband and raze ISIS, as mentioned in the article. But recognizing that the attack was not all ISIS, and that others assisted, is crucial to arresting the correct people and taking appropriate actions. In my opinion, France is completely justified in increasing attacks on ISIS, and getting other countries like the US and Belgium to aid them. How France and others react now will determine the outcomes for actions in the future, so extra caution and thoughtfulness is needed by leaders and citizens alike. Therefore I see this article as being one that encourages, but warns readers on this issue at hand.

Citation:

"Paris Attacks: France Intensifies Air Strikes on Isis in Syria - FT.com." Pearson. The Financial Times Limited, 17 Nov. 2015. Web. 17 Nov. 2015. <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/7d0ea3ea-8cf9-11e5-8be4-3506bf20cc2b.html#slide0>.

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Nepal Attacks India Response


Nepal PM Attacks India for Raising Human Rights Abuses at UN Meet

World | Indo-Asian News Service | Updated: November 06, 2015 17:03 IST


Nepal Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli demanded to know how India could be ignorant that the UN was involved in Nepal's peace process.

KATHMANDU: Nepal Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli today criticised India for raking up human rights abuses in the Himalayan nation at a UN Human Rights Council meet in Geneva.

India, for the first time, raised the issue of war crimes committed during the decade-long conflict in any international forum and urged Nepal to carry out the transitional justice mechanisms in an effective way.

Speaking to the media, Mr Oli demanded to know how India could be ignorant that the UN was involved in Nepal's peace process.

He said India had not made its position public earlier on Nepal's transitional justice mechanisms or their efficacy but raised the issue at an international body.

The Indian representative said in Geneva that Nepal should "ensure the effective functioning of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and full implementation of its recommendations, including prosecution of those responsible for violent insurgency".

This has been widely interpreted in Kathmandu as another example of India's harsh stand vis-a-vis Nepal.

Without taking any name, Mr Oli said: "Some days back, one of the leaders from our neighbourhood publicly warned that India will show its mettle against Nepal.

"Now, they are digging out a decade-old-issue," he added.

The prime minister said Nepal had formed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and another commission to probe the disappeared people to address war crime issues such as killings, torture and rape.

"We faced war in the past. Then we realized it was not possible to have war all the time. So we initiated the peace process," said Mr Oli, adding Kathmandu also invited the UN to resolve the armed conflict.

"The conflicting parties in the past are together today and carrying out democratic and peaceful reforms, whether they are in the government or not," he said.

Story First Published: November 06, 2015 15:11 IST

Response:

Although an old issue may be dug up, this article definitely addresses either the Indians, or it is informing the citizens of Nepal. It is definitely written from Nepal's perspective, and includes their pride too. The article is slightly difficult to understand, but we can see that Nepal is trying their hardest to clean up their issues, and they are criticizing India for not taking care of their crime problems. The author obviously thinks highly of his country for doing its best to create peace, while at the same time bashing India for not recognizing their efforts. The publisher has a slightly different bias because of their stance. The Indo-Asian News service includes both India and Nepal, so if the publisher were to have wrote the article, we would recognize a unique perspective. I think I agree with the publisher. Nepal is correct to attempt to solve their issues, but they are slightly wrong in abasing India. Yes, they do need to take care of their problems too, but that's their business and problem, not Nepal's. With that in mind, the reasoning behind writing this could be that Nepal wants to bolster their reputation as a successful and peaceful country. There could be many other reasons, but this one was most predominant as I read this article.

Citation:

"Nepal PM Attacks India for Raising Human Rights Abuses at UN Meet."
NDTV.com. Indo Asian News Service, 6 Nov. 2015. Web. 09 Nov. 2015. <http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/nepal-pm-kp-sharma-oli-flays-indian-statement-in-geneva-1240804>.

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Priests for Equality Response


Catholic priests call for talks on equality for women

Twelve clerics seek open discussion of issue and say sanctions have silenced those in favour



Fr Tony Flannery is one of 12 priests who could “no longer remain silent because to do so colludes with the systemic oppression of women within the Catholic Church”. File photograph: Alan Betson/The Irish Times

Patsy McGarry Mon, Nov 2, 2015, 15:09

Twelve Catholic priests have issued a joint statement calling for open discussion on the need for equality for women in the church, including where priesthood is concerned.

“Discriminating against women encourages and reinforces abuse and violence against women in many cultures and societies,” they say.

The priests, many of whom have been prominent in the Association of Catholic Priests (ACP), are Frs Tony Flannery, Eamonn McCarthy, Kevin Hegarty, Roy Donovan, Pádraig Standún, Adrian Egan, Benny Bohan, Seán McDonagh, John D Kirwin, Ned Quinn, Donagh O’Meara, and Tony Conry.

“We believe that we can no longer remain silent because to do so colludes with the systemic oppression of women within theCatholic Church. So, in the spirit of Pope Francis constant encouragement of dialogue, we are calling for free and open discussion concerning the full equality of women in all facets of church life, including all forms of ministry,” they say.

Their statement begins with a quotation from St Paul’s letter to the Galatians, that “there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one inChrist Jesus. ”

Pope John Paul II

It notes how “in the Catholic Church women, despite being equal to men by virtue of their Baptism, are excluded from all positions of decision making, and from ordained ministry” and how “in 1994 Pope John Paul II declared that the exclusion of women from priesthood could not even be discussed in the church.”

This, they say, was reaffrimed and even strengthened by Pope Benedict who insisted “that it was definitive and that all Catholics were required to give assent to this view”.

Pope Francis “has said that Pope John Paul II had reflected at length on this matter, had declared that women could never be priests and that, therefore, no further discussion on the ordination of women to ministry is possible”.

The 12 priests say “we, the undersigned, believe that this situation is very damaging, that it alienates both women and men from the church because they are scandalised by the unwillingness of church leaders to open the debate on the role of women in our church. This alienation will continue and accelerate.”

They were “aware that there are many women who are deeply hurt and saddened by this teaching. We also believe that the example given by the church in discriminating against women encourages and reinforces abuse and violence against women in many cultures and societies.

“It is also necessary to remember that women form the bulk of the congregation at Sunday Mass and have been more active in the life of the local churches than many men.”

The “strict prohibition on discussing the question has failed to silence the majority of the Catholic faithful,” they say.

“Survey after survey indicates that a great many people are in favour of full equality for women in the church. But it has managed to silence priests and bishops, because the sanctions being imposed on those who dare to raise the question are swift and severe.”

Full statement at www.associationofcatholicpriests.com or www.tonyflannery.com.

Response:

As I read this article, it captivated me and kept me interested the whole time. The author didn't really have anyone in particular he was talking to. Maybe it was directed to the people encouraging men's superiority. Or it could be uplifting struggling women in the Catholic Church. But whoever the writer was talking to, he clearly had a specific slant as he wrote. While promoting the women’s point of view, the reader is taken to that perspective. The publisher is the same way. Their side of the subject is what is being detailed upon. I partially agree with both sides. Although I think women should not be put down by men, I believe it is the man’s place to lead at church and in the home. What kind of stumps me is why they would write this article. I mean, maybe they’re just voicing this issue, maybe they’re just updating readers. But either way, I found the article quite fascinating.

Citation:

McGarry, Patsy. "Catholic Priests Call for Talks on Equality for Women."
Catholic Priests Call for Talks on Equality for Women. The Irish Times, 02 Nov. 2015. Web. 02 Nov. 2015. <http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/catholic-priests-call-for-talks-on-equality-for-women-1.2414201>.

Monday, 26 October 2015

Suicide Attack Response

At least 3 dead in suicide attack at Saudi mosque: State TV

Reuters | Oct 26, 2015, 10.23 PM IST


The Najran region (highlighted by map pin) where a blast took place inside a mosque.

DUBAI: A suicide bomber blew himself up at a mosque in Najran in southern Saudi Arabia on Monday, killing at least three people and wounding several others, Saudi-owned al-Arabiya television reported.

The attack on the al-Mashhad mosque occurred during evening prayers, and authorities were investigating the bombing, a Saudi news website reported, without giving further details.

A video shared by daily newspaper al-Watan showed panicked worshippers fleeing the scene and a child falling to his knees as sirens wailed and dust filled the street.

On August 6, a suicide bomber killed at least 15 people in an attack on a mosque used by members of a local security force in southwest Saudi Arabia, an assault that an online statement said was carried out by Islamic State.

In May, two suicide bomb attacks on Shi'ite Muslim mosques in Saudi Arabia were claimed by Islamic State. The first on a mosque in Qatif in the east of the kingdom killed 21 worshippers, and another four died in a bombing a week later at a mosque in Dammam.

Another bombing claimed by Islamic State on a Shi'ite mosque in Kuwait in June killed 27 people.

The militant group, bitterly opposed to Gulf Arab rulers, is trying to stir sectarian confrontation on the Arabian peninsula to bring about the overthrow of the states' ruling dynasties. It has urged young Saudi Sunni Muslims in the kingdom to attack targets including Shi'ites.

There was no immediate word on the religious affiliation of the mosque. Ismaili Shi'ites are a majority in the Najran area but a minority in mainly Sunni Saudi Arabia.

Response:

This article does a short recap of what happened, and also reflects on other bombings this past week. For the conclusion, it defines the connection between the attacks and the two sub-religions. The author does a really good job of not showing bias, if there is any. You can't see if it's from a western perspective or not. Also, the publisher is from India, so they bring a unique perspective. I think that this gap in Islam is getting worse, considering the encouragement of fighting and number of lives being lost. I mean, the situation wasn't pretty in the first place, but tensions build up over time and eventually people do attack. I think this argument is the same way. Sunni's are getting restless, and therefore things like this are beginning to happen more often.

Citation:


Reuters. "At Least 3 Dead in Suicide Attack at Saudi Mosque." The Times of India. Times Internet, 26 Oct. 2015. Web. 26 Oct. 2015. <http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/At-least-3-dead-in-suicide-attack-at-Saudi-mosque-State-TV/articleshow/49543670.cms?>.

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Power Failure Response


Special Report: Power failure in Iraq as militias outgun state

ERBIL, IRAQ | BY NED PARKE

In April, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi sat at a conference table in his Baghdad office with almost two dozen men in combat fatigues. The men were not officers in the Iraqi Army, but representatives of the Shi'ite paramilitary groups that have led the fight against Islamic State.

Hadi al-Amiri, one of the most senior militia leaders, delivered a long and forceful monologue on his fighters' recent victories. Abadi, in a blazer and tie, listened, occasionally jotting down notes, a video of the meeting shows. A few minutes later, Abadi himself praised the fighters.

The event was a sign of the delicate power balance in Iraq.

Abadi, a Shi'ite, came to office just over a year ago backed by both the United States and Iran. He promised to rebuild the fragmented country he inherited from his predecessor, Nuri al-Maliki, who was widely accused of fueling sectarian divisions.

Since then, though, even more power has shifted from the government to the militia leaders.

Those leaders are friendly with Abadi. But the most influential describe themselves as loyal not only to Iraq but also to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Three big militias – Amiri's Badr Organisation, Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kataib Hezbollah – use the Iranian Shi'ite cleric's image on either their posters or websites. Badr officials describe their relationship with Iran as good for Iraq's national interests.

Initially, Abadi had little choice but to lean on the Shi'ite paramilitary forces. They grew in power after Sunni extremist group Islamic State captured large parts of northern Iraq in June last year and Iraq's top Shi'ite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, called for volunteers to fight Islamic State, which soon declared a caliphate straddling the border with neighboring Syria.

As the Shi'ite militias' popularity surged, Abadi publicly lamented the lack of Western support. He made plain his desperate desire for help earlier this month after Iran and Russia opened offensives against the group in Syria. The prime minister said he would welcome Russian air strikes in Iraq as well. Abadi is looking not just to hurt Islamic State but to bolster his own position in Iraq.

Over the past few months he has attempted to impose his authority on the militia commanders and their political allies, and remind Iraqis he is the country's legitimate leader. That is stoking tensions around who controls Iraq.

Abadi's resources remain limited. Iraq's regular military has not recovered from last year's defeat by Islamic State. Most young Shi'ite Iraqi men now prefer to join the paramilitary groups, which are seen as braver and less corrupt.

One army division is now under informal militia command, according to U.S. and other Western military officers. Shi'ite paramilitary elements have taken at least partial control of the Interior Ministry, according to security officers, Iraqi politicians and U.S. military officials. The Iraqi government rejects that claim.

The Shi'ite militias, which dominate most frontlines, say they support the government and pose no threat to Iraq's minority Sunni sect. The Popular Mobilisation Committee, or Hashid Shaabi, as the militias are collectively known, belongs "to the Iraqi government," said Naim al-Aboudi, a spokesman for the Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia. "The Hashid doesn't represent a sect. It represents all Iraqis."

But the militias make no secret of their independence from Baghdad. Militia leader Amiri warned in a televised interview last month that if the Shi'ite groups did not approve of U.S. military operations in Iraq, "We can go to Abadi and the government and ... pressure them: 'Either you will do this, or we will do that.'" Amiri did not specify what action his group would take.

A senior Iraqi government official close to the prime minister said the militias operate independently. He said their objectives only sometimes align with Abadi's: They concentrate on defending areas that are strategically important for their sect.

"If they are not paid by the prime minister," this official said, "they can do what they want."

Abadi came to power in September 2014, promising to heal the Sunni-Shi'ite rift and end graft. But those early ambitions soon ran out of steam. After public protests broke out in late July over electricity and water supply problems, he launched a new anti-corruption campaign. He also said he would prune his government, cutting his three deputy prime ministers and the three vice presidents, one of whom is his predecessor Nuri al-Maliki.

Amiri and fellow militia leader Abu Mehdi Mohandis, a close ally of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, have warned that the outcry for reform threatens Iraq's democracy. The prime minister's three deputies have defied him, questioning the legality of his decisions.

Tensions are rising. Men affiliated with the paramilitaries have beaten protesters, who include secular activists, ordinary citizens and reform-inclined Islamists. Protesters say at least two demonstrators have been killed since August.

Abadi's next steps will help determine whether the state can reassert itself. "Can Abadi deliver?" asked secular lawmaker Mithal Alusi. "Not like this ... Abadi is so weak he will not be able to deliver anything." Alusi also accused Iran's Revolutionary Guards, which back some of the militias, of weakening the prime minister in the name of "having chaos, so they can control everything."

Abadi insists he will continue to tackle corruption and repair the political system. "I will not back down even if it costs me my life," he said in a speech in late September to relatives of Iraqis killed fighting Islamic State. "The alternative is chaos and the return of abhorrent dictatorship."

MR NO-YES

Abadi's father was a Baghdad doctor fondly remembered for tending the poor. Abadi moved to Britain as a young man to study engineering. While he was in Britain, two of his brothers died at the hands of Saddam Hussein's Sunni-dominated regime.

Like his brothers, Abadi opposed the regime. But he also earned a reputation within Iraq's dissident circles as someone who changed his mind depending on circumstances, according to three people who know him. Colleagues nicknamed him Mr No-Yes.

When Abadi's government took office last September after a decade of sectarian conflict, it represented a new chance to unify Iraq.

His predecessor Maliki, also a Shi'ite and member of the conservative Islamist Dawa party, had polarized the country. Abadi spoke of reconciliation and appealed to Iraq's three main religious and ethnic groups – Sunni, Shi'ite and Kurd. Early on, he froze air strikes on civilian areas, regardless of the presence of Islamic State.

Abadi has long advocated unity. During the civil war in Iraq in 2006, as suicide bombers attacked Shi'ite markets and Shi'ite militias carried out reprisals, he said it was wrong to evict Sunnis from Baghdad. In the end, he said, all citizens would have to live together.

But he has also regularly gone along with hardliners in his Dawa party. And in power, he has struggled to fulfill promises, according to a former adviser. When he took office, Abadi vowed to end appointments based on party affiliation, for instance. But while he appointed a Sunni defense minister, he also named Dawa stalwarts to head government bodies, including the anti-corruption and media watchdogs.

Abadi's spokesman, Saad al-Hadithi, dismissed doubts about Abadi's resolve. "On the contrary, he has committed himself to these reforms," Hadithi said. "He can't just press a button and it will be done. There are obstacles and some corrupt sides standing against him."

WHOSE ARMY?

Abadi took office facing many challenges. He inherited a military that had all but collapsed. Three months before he became prime minister, Islamic State overran the army in Mosul, the largest city in the north. At its height, the militant group, which has used rape as a weapon of terror and executed Iraqi Shi'ites and Christians, controlled nearly a third of Iraq.

Abadi also faced a budget crunch because of his predecessor's heavy spending and the plummeting oil price. His backers lamented that a decent man, with little leadership experience, had been dealt an impossible hand.

Early on, Abadi struggled to work out what was left of the army and federal police. "There wasn't really a good picture of how many soldiers, how many police he really had, and who the hell is really on the rolls," said Lieutenant General Mick Bednarek, the senior U.S. military officer in Iraq from 2013 until July. Bednarek said Abadi and his defense minister worked hard on the issue and by November last year recognized the military was "ill prepared and lacking in leadership."

Abadi announced he had identified 50,000 "ghost soldiers" – fighters who don't exist but whose salaries are collected - and scrapped their positions. Critics believe there are many more ghost soldiers.

Abadi also turned to the militias for support. "He doesn't like it," said Bednarek, who retired in late August. "But he has to, because Iraqi security forces can't do it alone."

The Hashid Shaabi now commands more than 100,000 fighters. On paper, it receives over $1 billion from Iraq's state budget. Two Iraqi officials said the militias get additional funding from other sources, including Iran, religious clerics and political figures, but declined to give details. U.S. military officials believe large amounts of funding come from Iran.

Aboudi, the spokesman for the Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia, and Muen al-Kadhimi, a senior Badr official, said Iran provided money to Shi'ite armed groups before 2011. They said the payments stopped because of Iran's economic troubles and the withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from Iraq. Kadhimi said Iran still sends advisers and weapons to the militias via the Iraqi government. But Baghdad pays for all such equipment, he said.

Money has been harder to secure for Iraq's Defense Ministry. It spent months this year unable to fund a plan to hire 10,000 new recruits. The funds were finally approved in September. Attracting recruits has also proved difficult because most men prefer the militias.

"We have difficulty attracting Shi'ites and Sunnis to the army ... because of the damage that has been done to the army's reputation," said the senior government official close to Abadi.

Since the U.S. military opened training camps for the army in January, the army has failed consistently to find full brigades to send for training, Bednarek said. He estimates the army has only five functioning divisions – roughly 50,000 men, whose fighting readiness ranges between 60 and 65 percent.

Some of the best military and police – more than 80,000 men – are now based in Baghdad, Bednarek said, because Abadi wants to make sure the capital does not fall to Islamic State.

The Shi'ite militias have also made inroads within the government security apparatus.

The Fifth Iraqi Army Division now reports to the militias' chain of command, not to the military's, according to several U.S. and coalition military officials. The division rarely communicates with the Defense Ministry's joint operation command, from which Abadi and senior Iraqi officers monitor the war, the officials said.

Kadhimi, the senior Badr official, disputed that account. He said the Fifth Division does report to militia leader Amiri, but only because the Iraqi government had assigned him responsibility for security in the eastern Diyala region. Kadhimi said the Fifth Division still takes orders from the Defense Ministry's chain of command. The Defense Ministry also said the normal chain of command has not changed.

Iraqi security officers, Iraqi politicians and U.S. and Western military officers say the Interior Ministry has become another militia domain. The ministry came under the influence of Shi'ite militias previously, in 2005, and was accused of running death squads.

Today it is run by Mohammed Ghabban, a senior member of the Badr militia. Badr fighters fought alongside Iranian soldiers in the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. Ghabban once worked as the personal secretary to Badr chief Amiri.

One security officer in the Interior Ministry estimated that more than 70 percent of those working there are now loyal to militias – in particular Badr. The ministry also trains paramilitary fighters, the first security officer said, including special operations forces.

The Interior Ministry does not inform Abadi of all its activities and won't account for all the men on its rosters, according to a senior Iraqi government official.

Abadi spokesman Saad Hadithi said that rogue officers, loyal to different parties, had been working inside both the Interior Ministry and the Defense Ministry. But he said Abadi has started firing them.

"Some sides are trying to exploit this situation in order to achieve some political privileges, and we are confronting those people," said Hadithi.

The Interior Ministry declined to comment on that for this story.

Badr official Kadhimi said the allegations about the Interior Ministry were untrue, spread by embittered officers who lost power under the new minister.

"THEY ARE OUTLAWS"

While Abadi relies on the Shi'ite militias, he has expressed frustration at the limits to his authority. Not all militia activities are reported to him. This became clear in April, as the militias, without informing him, began shelling civilian areas as part of their campaign to retake the majority-Sunni city of Tikrit from Islamic State.

The action caught Abadi by surprise. "The Iraqi security forces had no clue. And Abadi had no idea. He wasn't happy about it. They didn't seek his permission," said Bednarek.

Abadi tried to assert control by calling in U.S. air strikes against Islamic State. But after the strikes helped force Islamic State to abandon Tikrit, Shi'ite militia fighters went on the rampage, looting and torching buildings. The looting happened hours after Abadi had toured the city.

A further blow came in May when Islamic State took the western city of Ramadi. Bednarek attributed the defeat to the military's poor morale. An officer in the Iraqi Special Forces withdrew the men under his command, Bednarek said, because he was worried about missing an official trip abroad. The officer's departure triggered a mass panic as other units saw his men fleeing.

As Islamic State's bloody campaign grinds on, the Iraqi state is struggling to regulate the militias' response.

On Aug. 10, an Islamic State suicide bomber attacked a Shi'ite wedding party in the eastern city of Baquba, killing 58. Shi'ite militia fighters responded by killing local Sunnis and dumping 25 or more bodies in the city's river, according to local officials. The massacre went unreported in local media.

In Tikrit, where thousands of residents returned after the defeat of Islamic State in April, people say they now live in fear of militias. Kidnappings and robberies by men in security uniforms have also risen in Baghdad. Alarmed, Abadi addressed the issue at a gathering of police, warning "there was a challenge against the state."

"These groups don't represent the security forces, nor the Hashid," he said. "They are outlaws and we must fight them."

Power failure in Iraq as militias outgun state (web version) here

(Parker reported from Erbil and Washington; Edited by Simon Robinson)

Response:

This article is very interesting, It offers new views that I didn't really see before and new information that was really informative. The audience of Parker was anyone who wasn't updated to what is going on in the middle east, which is mostly Americans. But as he writes, you can see he tends to lean a certain way. The way he describes Abadi and his actions shows he believes Abadi might not be the best leader for Iraq, even if he was "dealt a bad hand." Also, Parker mentions the stance Iraq is in military and economy-wise, but not ISIS. Yes, it would be harder to get the information from them, but as you read, there is definitely a diction that is wholly supporting Abadi's attempts to unify the Shi'ites and Sunnis. I believe the publisher has the same inclination. They are taking a stance on the side of unification, and fighting ISIS as a country, rather than scattered militias. I agree with them in the fact that it's going to take a lot of cooperation and empathy to win the struggle against ISIS. The reason behind writing this article could be that Parker wants people in the US to understand what is happening in this big world and choose who to fight for.

Citation:

Parker, Ned. "Special Report: Power Failure in Iraq as Militias Outgun State."
Reuters. Ed. Simon Robinson. Thomson Reuters, 21 Oct. 2015. Web. 21 Oct. 2015. <http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/21/us-iraq-abadi-specialreport-idUSKCN0SF0XG20151021>.







Monday, 5 October 2015

Iran Honors Dead Response

Iran honours dead as more hajj victims return home

Saudi emergency personnel stand near bodies of Hajj pilgrims at the site where at least 717 were killed and hundreds wounded in a stampede in Mina, near the holy city of Mecca, at the annual hajj in Saudi Arabia on September 24, 2015.
Photo: AFP

TEHRAN - Ceremonies took place across Iran on Sunday to honour citizens killed in a stampede at the hajj, as a second plane returned the bodies of 114 pilgrims from Saudi Arabia.

The latest repatriation of corpses from the giant September 24 crush came after 104 bodies were brought home on Saturday, leaving 246 of the country's 464 declared victims yet to be returned.

Iran has the highest death toll among the countries affected by the tragedy. Egypt was second worst hit with 138 dead and 96 still missing.

Thousands attended a procession for the dead in central Tehran with similar events taking place in provincial capitals.

Iran's hajj organisation chief Said Ohadi said late Saturday that 205 more bodies had been located, state television reported.

"Bodies that are clearly Iranian will be repatriated and identified in Iran," he said.

Health Minister Hassan Hashemi had said earlier that not all of the Iranian dead had yet been found and many were thought to be lying unidentified in sealed containers.

Iranian officials were trying to "repatriate more than 100 other bodies on Sunday night", interior ministry spokesman Hossein Ali Amir told state television.

Iran has accused Saudi Arabia of incompetence in its handling of safety at the hajj, further souring relations already strained by the civil war in Syria and conflict in Yemen.

Tehran has been deeply critical of the slow pace at which the Saudi authorities have identified the dead.

The kingdom says 769 pilgrims died in the tragedy, but tolls provided by foreign officials and media from 24 countries add up to well over 1,000.

Response:

I'm guessing not many Muslims are aware of the instability and probability of tragedy at the annual Hajj. This article could possibly be warning others for next year of the chance of danger. But at the same time, I sense the writer was trying to make something blatantly obvious for the reader, that this is NOT okay. He is trying to show readers the depth of the consequences of people's actions. What's also interesting is that the paper is from Singapore. I think this brings in a new and unique perspective to the situation. Singapore isn't really involved in the issue, nor have they really done anything to help. So their standpoint almost brings in a third party, saying this stampede needs to be thoroughly investigated and justice should be ordered. Personally, I believe the authorities should take control, and honor the dead with their actions afterwards. Maybe the writer was just sending this out for the good of the people, letting them have knowledge of what happened in Mina. But at the same time, there is a slight warning and caution in the diction. Therefore, maybe Muslims in the future will take an extra caution or two.

Citation:

AFP. "AisaOne20." 24 September 2015. Singapore Press Holdings Ltd.. 24 September 2015. <http://news.asiaone.com/news/world/iran-honours-dead-more-hajj-victims-return-home>

Monday, 28 September 2015

Political Cartoon Response




Refugees in Europe

Ben Jennings



Response:

As many people know, the issue of immigrants in Europe is quite controversial. It seems everybody has taken a side: for or against masses of people moving to seek better lives in different areas. The cartoonist thinks that the refugees are not receiving the warm welcome they had hoped for. I'm not sure if he agrees, saying they shouldn't be accepted, or just stating the fact that the original tolerance had worn off and acceptance is no longer given. But some people still persist and let refugees move on in. They continue to want these people to have a safe place and a foundation to begin again. I find that the cartoon is pretty persuasive and actual. It's true that Europeans are becoming weary of the huge numbers
"invading" their country and space. A brick was has been set up and division is clearly present. One of the reasons I find it so persuasive is the irony that is behind it. Usually, when people work hard, they want a nice reward. But at the same time, they aren't willing to give that reward if others have succeeded in escaping the turmoil in their homeland. There aren't many symbols, besides the wall and welcome sign. It's a very simple but deep cartoon. Although the issue will go on for more time after this, it's interesting to see others' perspectives and digest what they have put out for us to see.

Citation:

Jennings, Ben. "the Guardian." 18 September 2015. Guardian News and Media Limited. 28 September 2015. <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2015/sep/18/ben-jennings-europe-response-refugee-crisis-cartoonoodle>




Monday, 21 September 2015

Church Leaders Visit Mosque Response

Kenya: Church Leaders Now Visit City Mosque for Prayers

By Jeremiah Kiplang'at

Church leaders on Friday joined Muslims during Friday prayers at Jamia Mosque in Nairobi, in a gesture aimed at bolstering the relationship between the two faiths.

Leaders from various Christian denominations sat through the prayers and then addressed the press in the company of their hosts in the afternoon.

The religious leaders under the Inter-Religious Council of Kenya, said they had agreed to visit each other's places of worship to show solidarity in fighting intolerance among members of their faiths.

At the packed mosque, the Christians sat not far from the platform where Sheikh Abdullatif Essajee gave a short teaching before the prayers.

"Our brothers and sisters are here as a gesture of the cooperation and understanding that should exist between us. Where there is understanding, there is tolerance," said Sheikh Essajee.

Mandera Senator Billow Kerrow said it was good for people to live together despite professing different faiths.

He said the suspicions between Muslims and Christians had gone up following terrorist attacks in the country but added that such coming together would help wipe out such mistrust.

Mr Kerrow is a member of Jamia Mosque Executive.

The church leaders said they expected their Muslim counterparts to reciprocate soon by visiting their churches.

Catholic Church leader and Executive Director of Global Pace Foundation Daniel Omondi said: "Today we are sending a strong message that we are one humanity under one God. We are saying No to religious intolerance.

"We want all pastors and sheikhs to work together in order to rid this country of radicalism."

They challenged believers in different faiths to love one other as ordered by God.

"We are here to express our love for God together. We worship one God and He tells us to love one another," said Reverend John Alusiola of the Calvary Covenant Centre.

Response:

After I read this article, I didn't really know what to think. It's obviously being directed towards both Christians and Muslims not in Nairobi wo are hoping for a chain reaction. Their intentions are clear: they wish for calmer relations between the two religions. In general, most people don't like violence, so it seems logical. But at the same time, that is a bias. Not everybody agrees with the statement they're making. Church & Mosque leaders are trying to convince as many people as possible that this is the best and most practical solution to the chasm between Christianity and Islam. At the same time, the publisher has a bias. They agree with the writer in that this is perfectly acceptable and should be happening all over Kenya, maybe even the world. I don't really agree with the article. If the Church leaders were worshiping in the mosque to witness, and praise Jesus, I would be okay with this. But because Christianity isn't tolerant of other religions, I tend to slant away from their view, saying maybe this isn't the best way to do things. We can worship God together, but I would have a hard time worshiping God when a Muslim next to me is worshiping Allah.

Citation:

Kiplang'at, Jeremiah. "Daily Nation." 18 September, 2015. allAfrica. 20 September, 2015. <http://allafrica.com/stories/201509200027.html>.

Monday, 14 September 2015

Palestinians Win Approval Response


Palestinians win approval to fly flag at UN

Ireland votes in favour of resolution granting observer states the right to fly their flags

Palestinians overwhelmingly won the right to fly their national flag in front of the United Nations headquarters, a symbolic step opposed by Israel and the United States.

The change was made by the UN General Assembly, when a vast majority of member countries voted in favour of a resolution granting what are known as non-member observer states the right to fly their flags alongside member states.

Palestine became an observer state in 2012. The Vatican, the only other observer state, has held that status since 1964.

The flag is expected to be hoisted for the first time when the Palestinian Authority’s president, Mahmoud Abbas, delivers his remarks to the annual meeting of heads of state and government at the General Assembly on Sept 30th.Palestinian diplomats secured the support of a majority of the assembly, as was expected, with 119 countries voting in favour of the resolution, eight voting against it and 45 abstaining.

The resolution is part of the effort by Mr Abbas and his associates to gain international recognition for a Palestinian state on lands seized or controlled by Israel since the 1967 war. Israel and the United States have argued that such measures are meaningless without a negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“Today’s vote is a reaffirmation of the legitimacy of the national aspirations of the Palestinian people, of their existence among the nations of the world and their right to self-determination,” the Palestinian ambassador, Riyad H Mansour, said in thanking his General Assembly supporters.

Voting in favour of the resolution were the countries of the Arab world, Iran and nearly every African and Asian country. It was co-sponsored by more than 50 countries. Israel, the United States, Canada and Australia were among those that voted against it.

The 28-member countries of the European Union did not manage to take a united position as they had hoped.

Ireland voted in favour of the resolution alongside fellow-EU members France, Sweden,Italy, Spain, Slovenia, Luxembourg, Belgium and Malta.

Others, including Britain, Germany and Austria, abstained.

The US ambassador, Samantha Power, in explaining her no vote, said that raising the flag “is not an alternative to negotiations and will not bring the parties closer to peace.”

The Israeli ambassador, Ron Prosor, described the resolution as a cynical action. “Make no mistake, the goal of this resolution is a photo op,” Mr Prosor said.

“The Palestinians want to bring together world dignitaries and the media to gather around and watch as Mahmoud Abbas raises a flag. They plan to use the prestige of the UN as a backdrop for this charade.”

How much the resolution buoys Mr Abbas’ standing among his domestic constituency remains to be seen. On Thursday, Ghassan Khatib, vice-president of the Palestinian Birzeit University, called it “a good symbolic move” that he hoped would bring more tangible benefits.

“People need to see real achievements that have a practical impact on people’s lives,” he said.

In another international challenge to Israel, the European Parliament on Thursday overwhelmingly passed a resolution that supports labeling of products made in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, and for “differentiation” between Israel and the settlements in European relations.

The resolution does not mean settlement products will immediately be labeled, but increases the pressure on European leaders to move the initiative forward.

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel denounced it as “unjust” and said, “It also hurts peace.”

“The root of the conflict is not the settlements,”Mr Netanyahu said in a statement, adding, “We have historical memory of what happened when Europe labeled Jewish products.”

NYT, Reuters


Response:

As I read through this article, the realization of who it was actually for came to me. I realized Reuters was writing to the Irish. After all, they got what they wanted, and he was just letting them know what's going on. But at the same time, the aim was locals. People in the area. Not necessarily international. So as Reuters goes on, he explains the symbolism behind the Palestinians raising this flag, especially in front of the UN. It's like mocking the countries who don’t want them to have their own country. The article even mentions that Ireland did vote for the resolution, and for the raising of their flag. Their bias stands out as they say it's the only way peace can ever come. At the same time, the publisher is Irish. So not only do you have an Irish writer, but a publisher too. I think they both take the same side of things. Both want Palestine to become a country and they are influenced by which side Ireland has chosen. I tend to agree with the Western side of things. My American blood stands out as I look at this article. I don't think they should get their own country, but that’s my opinion. This writer is trying to convince me otherwise. I think he may be on the lookout for recruits on their side, but at the same time informing their people that they took a step towards the resolution.


Citation:

Reuters, NYT. "The Irish Times." September 11, 2015. The Irish Times. September 14, 2015. <http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/palestinians-win-approval-to-fly-flag-at-un-1.2348456>

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Diabetes Sufferers Plan Ahead Response

Diabetes sufferers urged to plan ahead for Hajj 

7:00am Sunday 6th September 2015
By Asian Image reporter

Diabetes sufferers heading to Mecca on the Hajj pilgrimage have been warned to plan the management of their condition during their religious journey.

Thousands of British Muslims will fly to Saudi Arabia for the event, which falls between September 20 and 25.

Diabetes UK is urging Muslim diabetics taking part in the Hajj to plan ahead how they will manage their condition while away.

Pilgrims may walk up to 20 kilometres a day, so the charity is encouraging Muslim diabetics taking part to check their feet carefully before travelling.

It advises them to visit their GP if they have any concerns, or if they are not used to this type of activity, as foot problems are a well-known complication.

Diabetes UK warns it is important to wear footwear suitable for walking long distances throughout the Hajj and check feet every day for anything unusual such as sore spots, hard skin or breaks in the skin.

It also stresses that hot weather and physical exertion, combined with the travel, mean extra precautions need to be taken.

It has a list of five actions for pilgrims: n Saudi Arabia is two hours ahead of the UK, so think about how this affects the timing of medication; n If you take insulin, the hot climate may affect it, so test more regularly; n If you are carrying insulin and needles on the plane, ensure you have a letter from your GP; n Take twice the quantity of medicine that you normally use with you and pack snacks just in case your plane happens to be delayed; n Contact your insulin manufacturer to see if it is supplied in Saudi Arabia.

Juliet O’Brien, diverse communities officer at Diabetes UK, said: “Thousands of British Muslims travel to the Hajj every year including diabetics.

“The pilgrimage is a once-in-a-lifetime experience and there’s no reason their condition has to get in the way.

“What is needed is careful planning and talking to your GP.

“There are a lot of things to organise.

“We also encourage anyone planning to observe Hajj this year to get their feet checked before they travel.”

For more information about diabetes visit the charity’s website at diabetes.org.uk/Guide-to-diabetes/Living_with_diabetes/Travel-and-insurance.

People can also call the Diabetes UK’s Careline, available on 0345 123 2399.

Response:

This article has several unique and fun aspects. Not only is it directed toward diabetic Muslims in Britain, but it's special in other ways. Since the topic isn't very controversial, its harder to see which side the writer is taking. They obviously want to help these Muslims to make their lives easier as they complete a religious pillar. The article offers several tips and things to make sure of while travelling to observe Hajj and walking the kilometers. They have an honest wish and desire to help and they therefore wrote the article for the Muslims' benefits. The publisher on the other hand is a more local and regional newspaper. So the audience ended up being more specifically for the Muslims in the area. I assume they also were trying to assist, but from a bit closer to home. When a reader views this, if they aren't Muslim or diabetic, they might just ignore its message and move on. But for the others, it provides handy information that would most likely be accepted. So not only was this article unique and interesting to read, but it might save some people a lot of pain later on.

Citation:

Reporter, Asian Image. "Lancashire Telegraph." September 6, 2015. Newsquest Media Group. September 6, 2015. <http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/13648397.Diabetes_sufferers_urged_to_plan_ahead_for_Hajj/>

My Bio


Saying my life is normal is a complete understatement. For the first nine years of my life, I grew up in the USA. My family moved to Kenya when I was ten. I have attended Rift Valley Academy for six years now and I really love it. There are six kids in my family, including me, and more than half are adopted. We are unique, especially because my father is Canadian and my mother is American. My parents teach at the school, so I live on campus. I really love to volunteer at the local hospital in the Maternity ward. I also love to travel, although it’s harder to do when I’m in school. Studying history has not always been my favorite, but I enjoy learning about what’s going on in our world today. It’s interesting to figure out what I believe and how I want to react. The Bible has helped me figure out my views and I hope to learn even more throughout this year.